| Author |
Message |
| AladdinFan92 |
 Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
| You have a point there. The Aladdin one looked kinda funny,but there were a couple that looked okay--TLK,BatB. They weren't too bad. I don't remeber what the TLM cover is supposed to look like.It's been a while since I saw it on Amazon. Can anyone put up a link to it? |
|
 |
| Janette Morgan |
| Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
| Nonetheless, they took a computer to it. Bad artists! |
|
|
| Syera |
| Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
| Janette Morgan wrote: |
| Probably because it's CG art. |
I don't think it's computer-generated. It looks more airbrushed to me. |
|
|
| AladdinsGenie |
| Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
| I do agree with you, Spike. I never really was a fan of any of them. I think I prefer the old ones even if they weren't exactly perfect either. I'm not a big fan of what they did to Al and Jas on our cover. They look odd. |
|
|
| Janette Morgan |
| Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
| Probably because it's CG art. The same thing happens whenever somebody tries to convert Monsters, Inc. into line-drawings -- it loses a lot. In my opinion, media so different shouldn't mix unless they can actually capture the line style. (I remember what happened when they tried to make Guybrush Threepwood 3-D... he lost half his nose! *Shudder*) |
|
|
| Syera |
| Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
| It's been my experience that a lot of cover arts look slightly off. *Shrug* |
|
|
| Spike |
| Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:58 am Post subject: Special Editions has stupid covers |
|
| Ok let me tell you this i didn't like aladdin's special ediditon cover it didn't seem like him, ok same outfits and everything but the face doesnt look like him at all same goes to jasmine..and now when i see the little mermaid's upcoming dvd cover i still see her looking stupid,anyone here feels the same??can't they just use better arts for the covers!!! |
|
|